{"id":62801,"date":"2026-10-05T23:49:16","date_gmt":"2026-10-05T23:49:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/?p=62801"},"modified":"2026-10-05T23:49:16","modified_gmt":"2026-10-05T23:49:16","slug":"periyazhwar-thirumozhi-4-9-2-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/2026\/10\/periyazhwar-thirumozhi-4-9-2-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"periyAzhwAr thirumozhi \u2013 4.9.2 \u2013 thannadiyAr thiRaththu &#8211; Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\">SrI: SrImathE SatakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: Sri varavaramunayE nama:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/2025\/06\/periyazhwar-thirumozhi\/\">periyAzhwAr thirumozhi<\/a>&nbsp;&gt;&gt;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/2026\/07\/periyazhwar-thirumozhi-4\/\">Fourth Centum<\/a> &gt;&gt; <a href=\"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/2026\/10\/periyazhwar-thirumozhi-4-9\/\">Ninth decad<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/2025\/11\/periyazhwar-thirumozhi-2-4\/\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/2026\/10\/periyazhwar-thirumozhi-4-9-2-part-1\/\">Previous<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>avathArikai<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">AzhwAr says that even if periya pirAttiyAr herself, who is the <em>purushakArabhUthai<\/em> [one who recommends jIvAthmAs to emperumAn to accept them] complains about fault in perumAL\u2019s servitor, periya perumAL will counter her and protect his follower. When perumAL is like this, AzhwAr asks whether anyone could be a servitor to anyone else<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>thannadiyAr thiRaththagaththuth thAmaraiyAL Agilum sidhagu uraikkumEl<\/em><br><em>ennadiyAr adhu seyyAr seydhArElnanRu seydhAr enbar pOlum<\/em><br><em>mannudaiya vibIdaNaRkAy madhil ilangaith thisai nOkki malarkkan vaiththa<\/em><br><em>ennudaiya thiruvarangaRku anRiyum maRRoruvarkku ALAvarE<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Word-by-word meanings<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>thAmaraiyAL Agilum<\/em> \u2013 even if it is pirAttiyAr, who is <em>purushakArabhUthai<\/em><br><em>than adiyAr thiRaththagaththu<\/em> \u2013 in the matter regarding self\u2019s servitor [self \u2013 emperumAn]<br><em>sidhagu<\/em> \u2013 their faults<br><em>uraikkum El<\/em> \u2013 if she starts counting<br><em>en adiyAr<\/em> \u2013 those who are my servitors<br><em>adhu<\/em> \u2013 those faults, which are such that one would feel shy to name them<br><em>seyyAr<\/em> \u2013 will not do<br><em>seydhAr El<\/em> \u2013 [owing to carelessness, with the thought that emperumAn will put up with them)<br>even if they do<br><em>nanRu seydhAr<\/em> \u2013 those acts are good only (they are enjoyable for me)<br><em>enbar pOlum<\/em> \u2013 speaking a few indifferent words like that, countering her<br><em>man udaiya<\/em> \u2013 having wealth<br><em>vibIdaNaRkA<\/em>y \u2013 for the sake of SrI vibhIshaNAzhwAn<br><em>madhiL<\/em> \u2013 having fortified walls<br><em>ilangai dhisai nOkki<\/em> \u2013 looking in the direction of lankA<br><em>malarkkaN vaiththa<\/em> \u2013 one who is reclining, with cool eyes<br><em>ennudaiya<\/em> \u2013 one, who is my lord<br><em>thiru arangarkku anRiyum<\/em> \u2013 apart from periya perumAL<br><em>maRRu oruvarkku<\/em> \u2013 for anyone else<br><em>ALAvarE<\/em> \u2013 will people carry out servitude?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Simple Translation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Even if periya pirAttiyAr herself, who recommends jIvAthmAs to periya perumAL for accepting them, were to speak about the faults of emperumAn\u2019s servitors, emperumAn would counter her, saying that his followers will not indulge in such faults. Even if they carry out such faults, carelessly, thinking that emperumAn would put up with them, that would be good, being enjoyable for him. He would say such indifferent words, countering her. periya perumAL reclines, looking in the [southern] direction of lankA, which has fortified walls, with his cool eyes, for the sake of vibhIshaNa, who has wealth. Will people carry out servitude to anyone else, other than that periya perumAL?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>vyAkhyAnam<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[Translator&#8217;s note: In the first part of this translation, we have seen the transltioin of vyAkhyAnam by maNavALa mAmunigaL. This, the second part, is the translation of thiruvAImozhip piLLai&#8217;s svApadhESam].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[thiruvAimozhip piLLai, in his svApadhESam, has given the same vyAkhyAnam as maNavALa mAmunigaL. In the end, he has given his svApadhESam for the term <em>thannadiyAr<\/em>, as follows]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>than \u2026<\/strong> &#8211; AzhwAr mercifully describes the manner in which periya perumAL and SrI ranganAyakiyAr [periya pirAtti] protect those, who have attained them, after a playful fight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>than \u2026<\/strong> &#8211; in order to experience the result of past deeds, jIvAthmA takes a form and resides within it. Since the jIvAthmA is under the control of the physical form, the jIvAthmA is not a <em>svathanthran<\/em> (independent). When a physical form is taken by the jIvAthmA and the jIvAthmA does not carry out the <em>vihitha karmam<\/em> (laid down deeds), it would lead to <em>akaraNE prathyavAyam<\/em> (fault on account of not carrying out the ordained deeds). To atone for this, the jIvAthmA has to carry out <em>parihAra dharmam<\/em> (activities to atone for the non-performance). Hence, the jIvAthmA carries out ordained karma. Due to this too, the jIvAthmA does not have <em>svAthanthryam<\/em>. Thus, the term <em>adiyAr<\/em> [as in <em>thannadiyAr<\/em>], refers to these people. When <em>svAthanthryam<\/em> is lost, it will lead to <em>pArathanthryam<\/em> [dependence] only; how could it be considered as <em>SEshathvam<\/em> [servitude]? Once <em>pArathanthryam<\/em> is established in the jIvAthmA, the jIvAthmA will realise that he is dependent on paramAthmA [emperumAn]. Once this realisation dawns in the jIvAthmA, he would take steps to make emperumAn happy, as a result of which, <em>SEshathvam<\/em> will manifest. Next, through the term <em>thannadiyAr<\/em>, the pAsuram refers to <em>anyaSEsha nivruththi<\/em> [not being a servitor to anyone other than emperumAn]. Where does <em>anyaSEshathvam<\/em> have its origin? In thirumanthram, the first word [<em>Om<\/em>] has three visible syllables, <em>a, u, ma<\/em> and a hidden fourth case [<em>luptha chathurthi<\/em>[, <em>Aya<\/em>, on top of the first syllable <em>a<\/em>. The first syllable <em>a<\/em> refers to bhagavAn, the third syllable,<em> ma<\/em> refers to jIvAthmA, the hidden case <em>Aya<\/em> refers to \u201cTo bhagavAn\u201d and the second syllable <em>u<\/em>, refers to exclusivity, also called in samskrutham as <em>avadhAraNam<\/em>.\u00a0 Thus, this term <em>Om<\/em> would refer to the meaning that the jIvAthmA is an exclusive servitor to bhagavAn [referred to in samskrutham as <em>ananyArha SEshathvam<\/em>]. Thus, through the term <em>Aya<\/em> [exclusive servitude], <em>anyaSEshathvam<\/em> gets removed. When a jIvAthmA carries out <em>kAmanAdhikAram<\/em> [indulging in an activity towards fulfilment of a desire \u2013 for example, desiring to reach <em>svargam<\/em> or desiring to have a child etc] one would approach a celestial entity and carry out a <em>yagyam<\/em> [ritual] to fulfil that desire. This leads to <em>anyaSEshathvam <\/em>[being a servitor to that deity]. By following the hidden fourth case <em>Aya<\/em> in <em>Om<\/em>, this <em>anyaSEshathvam<\/em> gets removed. When one follows <em>kAmyavidhi<\/em> [following other means to attain bhagavAn, such as <em>bhakthi yOgam<\/em>, the path of devotion], a <em>svasvAthanthryam<\/em> [dependent on oneself] gets created in the person. This too will get removed when one becomes a servitor to emperumAn. This is because, once a person considers emperumAn as the means to attain him, he will not consider other means. These attributes will be seen only in those who carry out activities fully aligned with their <em>varNASrama<\/em> [<em>varNa<\/em> refers to the division that one belongs to (such as brAhmaNa, kshathriya etc) and <em>ASrama <\/em>refers to one\u2019s status in life (such as bachelor, married etc)]. These people will carry out their <em>varNASrama<\/em> activities as ordained by emperumAn [<em>bhagavath AgyA<\/em>] and as a means to carrying out servitude to bhagavAn [<em>bhagavath kainkarya rUpam<\/em>]. For them, <em>anyaSEshathvam<\/em> will not be seen. However, for sages, who are not interested in reaching higher positions [such as brahmA, indhra et al] but are desirous of attaining mOksham, through their efforts [following other means instead of emperumAn], the streak of <em>svasvAthanthryam<\/em> will be present always. Since their activities revolve around a cause, such as their physical form [with <em>varNASrama<\/em> distinctions] and their <em>karma<\/em> [I am carrying out this <em>karma<\/em> to attain mOksham], their <em>svasvAthanthryam <\/em>will not get eradicated. In the explanation for the syllables in <em>Om<\/em>, the next term <em>nama<\/em>: explains the syllable <em>u<\/em>. This refers to the person declaring that he is not dependent on himself and leading to removal of any <em>anyaSEshathvam<\/em>. It is through the exclusivity term <em>u<\/em> that emperumAn\u2019s <em>SEshithvam<\/em> [being the master] gets established. This term [<em>u<\/em>] severs the servitude to others [than emperumAn] and to self. Even when \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019 is not there, the fact that jIvAthmA is servitor only to <em>sarvAdhikan<\/em> [the most supreme entity], denoted by \u2018<em>a\u2019<\/em> will be established, through the meaning. Being servitor to emperumAn will remove <em>anyaSEshathvam<\/em> [being servitor to others].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Next, thiruvAimozhip piLLai considers the syllable \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019 to refer to pirAtti [lakshmi]. Even here, there is no change in <em>nirUpaka <\/em>[identification] and <em>nirUpyam<\/em> [that entity which receives the identification]. The identification for jIvAthmA is one of <em>SEshathvam<\/em> [servitor to emperumAn]. Instead of being servitor to emperumAn, now this implies that he is servitor to pirAtti too. The syllables \u2018<em>a<\/em>\u2019 and \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019 will combine to form \u2018<em>O<\/em>\u2019 to indicate <em>SEshathvam<\/em> to both perumAL and pirAtti. Even when the syllable \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019 is considered as <em>avadhAraNam<\/em> [exclusivity], jIvAthmA is servitor to both perumAL and pirAtti, since pirAtti never separates from perumAL [this is attributed to bhagavath sEnApathi miSrar, as mentioned in SrIvachana bhUshaNam, a treatise compiled by our pUrvAchAryar, piLLailOkAchAryar]. Thus, there is no change in the<em> SEshathvam <\/em>of jIvAthmA, irrespective of the connotation taken for the syllable \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019, that he is a servitor both to perumAL and to pirAtti. bhattar [parASara bhattar, son of kUraththAzhwAn] had mercifully said that the jIvAthmA is servitor to perumAL and to pirAtti. This is because, just like emperumAn, she too had desired to be AchArya [she has given instructions to vishvaksEnar as well as instructed <em>lakshmi thanthram<\/em> [which deals with creation, sustenance and liberation to indhra, the head of celestial entities, over five nights]. Thus, since both perumAL and pirAtti are AchAryas, it is true that jIvAthmA is <em>SEshabhUthan<\/em> to both. aruLALapperumAL emperumAnAr [a disciple of rAmAnujar], in his work, pramEya sAram, had explained this clearly by saying in the first pAsuram \u201c<em>avvAvanavarkku mavvAnavar ellAm uvvAnavar adimai enRu uraiththAr<\/em>\u201d [jIvAthmAs, referred to by the syllable \u2018<em>ma<\/em>\u2019 are servitors to emperumAn, who is referred to by the syllable \u2018<em>a<\/em>\u2019 and this was mentioned by AchAryas, referred to by the syllable \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019. Since both pirAtti and AchAryas unite the jIvAthmA with emperumAn, pirAtti is also referred to by the syllable \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Next, thiruvAimozhip piLLai considers the syllable \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019 to refer to <em>achith<\/em> [entity which does not have power to think. This will include the physical form within which jIvAthmA resides]. Thus, both jIvAthmA, referred to by the syllable \u2018<em>ma<\/em>\u2019 and <em>achith<\/em>, referred to by the syllable \u2019<em>u<\/em>\u2019 are servitors. Applying the principle of exclusivity, here, it would mean and only <em>chith<\/em> [jIvAthmA] and <em>achith<\/em> are servitors to emperumAn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Among the three interpretations seen for the syllable \u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019 [first is that it denotes exclusivity, second is that it denotes pirAtti and the third is that it denotes <em>achith<\/em>], the one where it denotes exclusivity is the main one [\u2018<em>u<\/em>\u2019 denotes exclusivity, the first of the three interpretations], since that alone brings in <em>anyaSEshathva nivruththi<\/em> [being free from servitude to anyone other than perumAL, which is the meaning for the term \u201c<em>thannadiyAr<\/em>\u201d in the pAsuram under discussion]. Since all the words would reach up to bhagavAn [a word, for example, cow, would first refer to the animal, then to the jIvAthmA who is residing inside that animal and finally to bhagavAn, who has permeated that jIvAthmA; thus, all the words will refer to bhagavAn only] and since bhagavAn is the <em>antharyAmi<\/em> [in-dwelling soul] of all the deities, for all the jIvAthmAs, the servitude is only to emperumAn.\u00a0 Thus, <em>anyaSEsha nivruththi<\/em> is the most important parameter here. Those, who are engaged with <em>aupAdhika vihitha dharmam<\/em> [activities which are to be performed on account of having acquired a physical form, and these activities are ordained to be done (such as carrying out sandhyavandhanam etc); examples of such people are vyAsa, parASara, sukha et al] support those who are engaged with carrying out <em>aupAdhika kAmya dharmam<\/em> [activities which are carried out on account of having acquired a physical form and also towards meeting a desire (for example to attain the position of brahmA et al); examples of such people are athri, kuthsa, vasishta et al; these could include celestial entities and deities too] as <em>aupachArikam<\/em> [formal or honorific; not out of affection]. Even if they do not support them, there will be no fault. When such people [such as celestial entities and sages such as athri, kuthsa, vasishta et al] carry out their penances, since they pray to brahmA towards fulfilling their desire, their penances will get fulfilled only when mumukshus support them. This is similar to getting the title of <em>brahmarishi<\/em> [an eminent sage] only when sage vasishta agrees and gives the title. When carrying out activities which are <em>akaraNE prathyavAya dharmam<\/em> [activities, which, if they are not carried out, will lead to fault and sin], certain benefits are indicated [such as getting wealth, or land or cows etc] only as inducement. Only if desire in those benefits are removed and the activities are conducted since these have been ordained by bhagavAn, as <em>bhagavath AygyA<\/em>, and these are carried out towards pleasing emperumAn in the form of carrying them out as <em>bhagavath kainkarya rUpam<\/em>, would <em>anyaSEshathvam<\/em> get removed. For those, who consider emperumAn as <em>SEshi<\/em> [master], as <em>upAyam<\/em> [means to attain him] and as <em>upEyam<\/em> [benefit obtained on attaining him, which is carrying out kainkaryam to him to make him happy], the identification comes from the term <em>thannadiyAr<\/em>, in this pAsuram as mentioned in the term \u201c<em>man<\/em>\u201d [<em>mannudaiya vibhIdaNarkku<\/em> \u2013 SrI vibhIshaNAzhwAn, who had the wealth of carrying out kainkaryam to SrI rAma, after surrendering to him as the means and who considered SrI rAma as his <em>SEshi<\/em>].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We shall next consider the 3<sup>rd<\/sup> pAsuram of this thirumozhi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">adiyEn krishNa rAmAnuja dhAsan<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">archived in <a href=\"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\">https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org<\/a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">pramEyam (goal) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/koyil.org\/\">http:\/\/koyil.org<\/a><br>pramANam (scriptures) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/granthams.koyil.org\">http:\/\/granthams.koyil.org<\/a><br>pramAthA (preceptors) \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/acharyas.koyil.org\">http:\/\/acharyas.koyil.org<\/a><br>SrIvaishNava education\/kids portal \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/pillai.koyil.org\/\">http:\/\/pillai.koyil.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SrI: SrImathE SatakOpAya nama: SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: Sri varavaramunayE nama: periyAzhwAr thirumozhi&nbsp;&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Fourth Centum &gt;&gt; Ninth decad Previous avathArikai AzhwAr says that even if periya pirAttiyAr herself, who is the purushakArabhUthai [one who recommends jIvAthmAs to emperumAn to accept them] complains about fault in perumAL\u2019s servitor, periya perumAL will counter her and protect his follower. When &#8230; <a title=\"periyAzhwAr thirumozhi \u2013 4.9.2 \u2013 thannadiyAr thiRaththu &#8211; Part 2\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/2026\/10\/periyazhwar-thirumozhi-4-9-2-part-2\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about periyAzhwAr thirumozhi \u2013 4.9.2 \u2013 thannadiyAr thiRaththu &#8211; Part 2\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,717,726],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mudhalayiram","category-periyazhwar-thirumozhi","category-periyazhwar-thirumozhi-4th-centum"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62801"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62801\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62844,"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62801\/revisions\/62844"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/divyaprabandham.koyil.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}